Clan Munro At Culloden? by Don Munro

Many people believe that the Clan Munro was at the Battle of Culloden and when I last visited the Culloden battlefield, in the midst of the government army, there was a sign saying Munro’s 37th Foot. So it would seem that we have proof positive that the Munros were at Culloden – but were they? Let us look at the facts and find out what really happened.

Let us clear up one thing for a start. Many people believe that Culloden was a battle between the Scots and the English – it was not. It was a battle between the government forces and the rebel forces under the command of Charles Edward Stuart.  Scotland and England were united in 1603 when James VI of Scotland became James I of Scotland and England under what is known as the Union of the Crowns. A hundred years later, in 1707, we had the Union of the Parliaments. In other words we had one country.

Charles Edward Stuart, better known as Bonnie Prince Charlie, The Young Pretender, came to Scotland to claim the crown of Great Britain for his father, James Francis Edward Stuart. In this he was supported, somewhat reluctantly, by some but by no means all of the Highland clans. The Munros along with the Clans Campbell, Mackay, Grant, etc, supported the government against the forces of Bonnie Prince Charlie and in fact, at least as many, if not more, Scots opposed him than supported him.

So, let us get back to the Munros at Culloden. In 1745 Sir Robert Munro was the commanding officer of the Black Watch in Europe fighting for the British government against the French and there were many Munro officers and men serving in that regiment. Sir Robert made his name at the battle of Fontenoy. Although this was a defeat for the British forces the retreat was left to Sir Robert and the Black Watch and so well did they perform that Sir Robert was promoted and sent back to the UK as Commander of the 37th Regiment of Foot (a Hampshire regiment) to fight against Charlie. The custom of the time was to call the regiment by the name of its commanding officer, thus   we had Munro’s 37th Regiment of Foot.

The Munros first engagement was at the battle of Falkirk where Sir Robert’s soldiers turned tail and ran in the face of the charge of the Highlanders leaving him and other officers to face the highland hoard. They of course had no chance and Sir Robert and his brother, a doctor who ran on to the battlefield to help him, were killed by the highlanders (in fact by Camerons). It is said that Sir Robert was attacked by six Jacobites of from Cameron of Lochiel’s regiment. Although wounded, he managed to kill two of them with his half pike before a seventh Jacobite walked up, shot him with his pistol and then finished Sir Robert off with two sword blows to the head. The regiment then marched to Culloden.

I emailed the historian of the 37th Regiment of Foot to find out who their new Commanding Officer was and received this reply:- ‘’1746 on the 17th April, the 37th Regiment commanded by Colonel Dejean, with a total strength of 23 officers, and 468 men, took part in the battle of Culloden, which resulted in the utter collapse of the pretender Charles Edward. In this action the 37th had 14 men killed, 5 officers and 68 men wounded,”

From that you can see that the Munro regiment shown on the Culloden battlefield was in fact an English regiment, the name of which had not been changed although the commanding officer had changed. The regiment at that time should really have been called Dejean’s 37th Regiment of Foot and if it had been changed, there would have been no confusion about the Munros being at Culloden.

Although it is clear that the Munros did not fight at Culloden as a clan, that is not to say that there were no Munros there for, in a list of Jacobite prisoners taken after the battle, I found a William Munro, private, of Inverness-shire. Also in correspondence with a lady, she told me that a group of Munros from the West coast had been forced to join the Jacobite Clans on their march to the battle but I could find no proof of that.

The Black Watch, which had many Munros as officers and soldiers, was brought back from the continent but did not go to Culloden. It was based in the south of England to counter a French invasion (which did not happen) and also to ensure that the highlanders did not join Charlie’s force as some of them would have had relatives fighting on the opposing side.

We find so much on the internet that is wrong but you would expect something like Ripley’s “Believe it or not” to be accurate but no, it is no better than some of the others. The Ripleys are descended from William Munro from Stirling, Scotland, whose son, also William, emigrated to America. The website, by Theresa M. Ripley has a number of Munro stories, one of which tells how William’s grandfather was in the Black Watch with Sir Robert Munro. She says that the grandfather told young William many times how he had been at Culloden with the Black Watch and had taken part in the defeat of the Jacobites. I emailed Ms Ripley to tell her how wrong that story was and received a reply to the effect that she would correct it when she had time – I don’t know if that has been done.

12 Responses

  1. Michael Munro says:

    There is actually a way that some Munros could have been at Culloden. You may be familiar with the Independent Highland Companies that were raised in 1745 by Lord Forbes, one of which was a Munro company under George of Culcairn, but before you shout that Munro of Culcairn and his company were not present at the battle – yes that is right. But I have found that one if the Independent Highland Companies that was raised by the Earl of Sutherland was present at the Battle of Culloden and in the list of names of the soldiers in that Sutherland company there are actually quite a few Munros. The Earl of Sutherland himself was also at Culloden.

    • Michael Munro says:

      Sorry that should be “one of the Indpendent Highland Companies that was raised” .. no “one if”

  2. Michael Munro says:

    Sorry that should be above “one of the Independent Highland Companies that was raised by the Earl of Sutherland”, not “on if”.

  3. Michael Munro says:

    Sorry just to clarify, my messed up posts above. Basically one of the Earl of Sutherland’s companies was present at the Battle of Culloden and it included Munros as the names of the soldiers in the Independent Companies has survived.

  4. Malcolm Hamilton says:

    By the time of the Battle of Culloden, Munros are very well documented, and there is no doubt that they were involved. Whether one can say that Clan Munro was involved depends upon how you define that involvement.

  5. Art Taylor says:

    I wish to simply thank you and all contributors to this site. I am fascinate history and very much thank you for the work to assemble and share the knowledge.

  6. So, to go into more detail, we have to have a clear understanding of the military units. The Black Watch Regiment, that was first properly regimented in 1739, is not to be confused with the Independent Companies that were raised in 1745, one of which George Munro of Culcairn was a Captain of.
    The Black Watch Regiment that was regimented in 1739 was made up of the then ten existing Independent Companies. However, as has already been covered, after the Battle of Fontenoy, Sir Robert Munro, 6th Baronet was in the Black Watch Regiment was made Colonel of the English 37th Regiment of Foot and was killed at Falkirk. Robert’s son Sir Harry, later the 7th Baronet, was an officer in Loudon’s 65th Highlanders Regiment and was captured at the Battle of Prestonpans. As it happens 3 companies of Loudon’s Regiment fought at Culloden and were 3 of the 8 companies that made up the Highland Brigade. This is detailed in the book Culloden: The Last Clan Battle by Tony Pollard. Whether any Munros were in the 3 companies of Loudon’s Regiment at Culloden is not known.
    George Munro of Culcairn had actually retired from the Black Watch Regiment in 1744. This is the regiment that was formed from the ten Independent Companies in 1739. However, upon the outbreak of the Jacobite rising of 1745, Lord Forbes of Culloden received a commission to raise 18 new Independent Highland Companies to oppose the Jacobites. One of these was formed from the Clan Munro and was Captained by George Munro of Culcairn. They may well have been involved in the Battle of Inverurie in 1745. Two days before the Battle of Culloden George Munro of Culcairn met up at Nairn with the Duke of Cumberland but returned north, presumably to deal with the problems at Foulis and so was not present at Culloden.
    However, the Earl of Sutherland had raised two Independent Highland Companies to support the Government. Now, the Jacobite Mackenzie, Earl of Cromartie had captured the Earl of Sutherland’s Dunrobin Castle, and the Earl apparently escaped through a back door and set sail to meet the Duke of Cumberland which he did – and the 1st Sutherland Independent Company, which was Captained by Alexander Gunn, went with him. The 2nd Sutherland Independent Company stayed in Sutherland and one day before the Battle of Culloden, together with one of the Mackay companies, they defeated the Earl of Cromartie’s forces at the Battle of Littleferry and soon after captured Cromartie himself. Meanwhile the 1st Sutherland Company, which was Captained by Alexander Gunn, along with the Earl of Sutherland met up with the Duke of Cumberland and were present at the Battle of Culloden. However, they were kept in reserve, nether the less were present at the battle. Now, I have a book with a list of all of the soldiers in the 1st Sutherland Company that was Captained by Alexander Gunn and it includes some Munros.

    If you follow this link to David Dobson’s book Scottish Highlanders on the Eve of the Great Migration then you should find an Alexander Munro in Alexander Gunn’s Independent Company which was at Culloden. Of course most of the Munros in the book are in George Munro of Culcairn’s company, but there are other Munros in some of the other Independent Companies:
    https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=UCfdGz0qv1kC&q=Alexander+Munro+Alexander+Gunn#v=snippet&q=Alexander%20Munro%20McGilichallum&f=false

  7. Just to clarify, the above mentioned book by David Dobson is the “Northern Highlands Edition” of the series. Also, much of the information about the Independent Companies comes from Peter Simpson’s book The Independent Highland Companies 1603 – 1760

  8. Margaret Bardin says:

    This is a wonderful article, Don. Do you mind if I submit it to Allison Munro Alger, who is the new editor of CMA-USA?

    Thanks,

    Margaret

  9. Don says:

    This post has certainly left us better informed, with expert views expressed. What I said in the post was, I think, quite clear. The Munros were not there as a Clan – to have done so would mean them being there under the command of their chief and that was certainly not the case. Certainly the Clan Munro in Scotland does not believe that they were there. So, I repeat, The Clan Munro was not at Culloden.

  10. colin says:

    Jean Munro has a brief article on this subject on the Clan Munro Website. See http://www.clanmunro.org.uk/info24.htm

    It begins: “Visitors to the National Trust for Scotland Visitor Centre at Culloden may be surprised to be told that some two hundred Munros fought there for the Hanoverian King George 11 on 16 April 1746. This is completely untrue.”